[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Dime] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt

To: "'ext Romascanu, Dan $Dan$'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Dime] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt
From: "Bernard Aboba" <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:50:09 -0800
Cc: <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <004b01c94205$4a9ea370$dfdbea50$@net>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04F01397@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com><00e201c93c54$41cca5a0$04ffa8c0@nsnintra.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A040109B072@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <000201c941e7$c0db5420$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net> <004b01c94205$4a9ea370$dfdbea50$@net>

Glen Zorn said:

"Still looks like (bad) RADIUS to me."

Can someone explain the relationship of this document to (bad or good)
RADIUS?

Looking at the DIME WG charter, there is an item for the Diameter QoS
application
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos-06.txt), 
Which in turn has normative references to QoS Attributes for Diameter
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes-08.txt)
and this document.

None of these documents request allocation of any RADIUS attributes, or
describe RADIUS Attribute formats.  




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Dime] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt
  - From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Review of draft-lourdelet-radext-rfc3162bis-01.txt
Next by Date: RE: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Dime] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt
Previous by thread: Cmts on ExtAttrs-05
Next by thread: RE: [AAA-DOCTORS] [Dime] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread