RE: [Dime] [AAA-DOCTORS] AD Review of dime-qos-parameters-06.txt

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Hannes Tschofenig [mailto://Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] writes:


> Hi Mikko,
> 
> the reason is that we essentially "copied" the format defined in the
> NSIS
> group as they have been working on the definition of the QoS
> parameters.
> In the past folks in DIME did not have a problem with the format and I
> also
> specifically asked for feedback on this issue.
> 
> In fact, I even compiled a version of the draft with Diameter encoding
> once:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-05

As luck would have it, I think that was the one I read :-) -- no wonder I
had no problem.

> As one can see from that document it isn't totally easy either to use
> Diameter AVPs as the format that is being referenced comes directly
> from a
> various RFCs and there is the obvious question whether the format
> should be
> taken as is or also "translated". For example, take a look at Section
> 3.11.3. of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-05
> (PHB-Class AVP).

What's wrong with it?  It seems at least as comprehensible as section 4.13
of -06...

...


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>