[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document

To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:15:13 +0100
Cc: "radiusext@ops.ietf.org" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <BLU137-W11CE469E1D62F3F82CFFF993E60@phx.gbl>
References: <48D29EBC.7050701@gmx.net> <ADEE801316A744B1B73BC3EB30EC53B1@xpsuperdvd2> <006801c9668f$77a7ec60$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net> <E93C26F4734B42469081CE9DD5EBBEC1@NEWTON603> <009901c96815$acb5b040$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net> <BLU137-W4BADABA4F909DC5EBB99C93E60@phx.gbl> <002701c96985$8009e9f0$801dbdd0$@net> <BLU137-W11CE469E1D62F3F82CFFF993E60@phx.gbl>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)

  Given the recent discussion on this document, can we pull it out of
IETF last call, and edit it within this WG again?

  I think there are a fair number of changes to make.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document
  - From: "Dave Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>

References:
- Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document
  - From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 298
Next by Date: RE: Issue 298
Previous by thread: Re: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document
Next by thread: RE: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread