RE: Issue: Use of the term "extended" within the Design Guidelines Document

["Dave Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>]

Alan DeKok writes...

> Given the recent discussion on this document, can we pull it out
> of IETF last call, and edit it within this WG again?

After some offline discussion with our AD, Dan Romascanu, it seems the path
we take will depend on the complexity of the changes.  Minor edits to add
clarification can be done as part of the IESG review process, e.g. handled
by RFC Editor Notes.

I think before pulling the draft back, let's see a proposed set of editing
instructions on the list, e.g. s/foo/bar, and see how bad the damage is.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>