[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: RADSEC and DTLS docs

Submitter name: Joe Salowey
Submitter email address: jsalowey@cisco.com
Date first submitted: 3/26/2009
Document: draft-ietf-radext-radsec-04.txt
Comment type: T
Priority: 1
Section: 
Rationale/Explanation of issue:
Many of the details between RADSEC and DTLS should be the same.  I'm
worried that the two specs may diverge if the progress differently
through the IETF.  Is there any reason why we cannot cover DTLS in this
draft as well?  

Requested change:
Have the document cover DTLS.  

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>