Re: Issue: RADSEC and DTLS docs

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
> Many of the details between RADSEC and DTLS should be the same.  I'm
> worried that the two specs may diverge if the progress differently
> through the IETF.  Is there any reason why we cannot cover DTLS in this
> draft as well?  
> 
> Requested change:
> Have the document cover DTLS.  

  I'll rev the DTLS document soon.  We can then see how much of it
simply references radsec.  If the DTLS-specific portions are small, it
may be good to add them to the radsec document.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>