[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPv6
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> ...I don't see a need to reference future documents, when those
> documents can simply state that they update this one.
True. OTOH, I don't see any need to be coy about "future documents"
when we know exactly what document we're talking about and exactly
what it recommends. Often the best approach is the most
straightforward approach.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- References:
- Re: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>