[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IPv6
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan DeKok [mailto:aland@deployingradius.com]
> Sent: 06 October 2009 21:47
> To: Wojciech Dec (wdec)
> Cc: Bernard Aboba; David B. Nelson; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6
>
> Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote:
> > Woj> Indeed... What's the IPv6 document being referred
> to here? If
> > it happens to be draft-lourdelet-radext-ipv6-access,
> then it does
> > not define any new tagging scheme.
>
> Uh... have you compared it to RFC 2868?
That same RFC 2865, in section 5, states:
string 1-253 octets containing binary data (values 0 through
255 decimal, inclusive). Strings of length zero (0)
MUST NOT be sent; omit the entire attribute instead.
With that, Ipv6 Prefix, Route options, Auth-IPv6-Prefix-User-ID, etc
would be pretty much covered by using the string term.
>
> 3.3 IPv6-Prefix
>
> Defines an IPv6 prefix with a tag. There are NO existing
> tagged IPv6 attributes. RFC 2868 defines tagged integers and
> strings *only*. This data type is new.
>
> 3.5 IPv6-Route-Option-Lifetime
>
> Defines an 8-bit tag, followed by a 32-bit integer. RFC
> 2868 defines a 32-bit integer where the 8-bit tag over-writes
> the highest 8 bit of the integer. This data type is new.
>
> 3.6 and 3.7 have the same issue.
>
> 3.8. Auth-IPv6-Prefix-User-ID
>
> Defines an 8-bit tag followed by a 64-bit integer. There
> are NO existing attributes that are tagged 64-bit integers.
> This data type is new.
Are unsigned 64-bit integers really a new thing to Radius? That would
seemingly contradict what's presented as de facto in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-design-08#section-2.1.1
-Woj.
>
>
> This draft defines a number of new tagged data types which
> are not previously used in any RFC, or on any vendor
> equipment, or in any specification from another standards body.
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6
- From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- References:
- Re: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: IPv6
- From: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>
- Re: IPv6
- From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>