[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [radext] #42: A1.4
> [BA] Mailing list discussion indicates that there is not consensus to
> deprecate existing RADIUS types. Suggested change:
>
> There is a trade-off in design between re-using existing formats for
> historical compatibility, or choosing new formats for a "better"
> design. This trade-off does not always require the "better" design
> to be used. As a result. pre-existing complex data types described
> in Appendix B MAY be used.
As much as it disappoints me personally, I don't dispute the fact. We did
not obtain consensus.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>