[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [radext] #36: Section 3.2.3



Dave Nelson wrote:
> This is a single sentence out of context, so my concern may be addressed
> elsewhere, but I've always felt that one important test of "opaqueness" is
> whether or not the payload of the attribute is laid out in details in the
> RADIUS document, in the traditional fashion of other RADIUS attributes.  If
> it's truly opaque, then the format MUST be defined in some other, non-RADIUS
> document.

  Yes.  See Section 2.1, which says this explicitly.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>