[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RRG] On deployability
- To: rrg <rrg@psg.com>
- Subject: [RRG] On deployability
- From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:21:47 +0100
Hi all,
One of the issues that came up today was that of incremental
deployability. Many people felt that incremental deployability is an
absolute hard and fast requirement.
My question: suppose that we had a solution that was a ships-in-the-
night deployment? Would that suffice? Just as we are rolling out
IPv6 in parallel with IPv4, would it be sensible to roll out IPv6+ in
parallel with v6 and v4? Assume that some form of tunneling could be
used to bridge islands of connectivity.
Regards,
Tony
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg