[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D

To: "Ricardo V. Oliveira" <rveloso@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:03:30 -0700
Cc: rrg@psg.com
In-reply-to: <EC21CF3D-BE91-4E56-8EA1-65C6C8A11268@CS.UCLA.EDU>
References: <ceb.e8e9ae1.335fdf25@aol.com> <200704251407.l3PE7ALG017471@smtp.nist.gov> <2E61489A-7534-499B-931B-3EDB8CAC8E5F@cs.ucla.edu> <5A0578F9-3F5A-4E5E-B864-7D48360F50FF@cisco.com> <EC21CF3D-BE91-4E56-8EA1-65C6C8A11268@CS.UCLA.EDU>


Ricardo,

On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Ricardo V. Oliveira wrote:

For instance, the table size also depends on the address andaggregation schemes used.Alternative schemes to IPv4+BGP might not only reduce the tablesize, but also decrease route length compared to BGP.



Ok, thanks for replying.  On those points, we're in complete agreement.

Regards,
Tony

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
  - From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
- Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
  - From: "K. Sriram" <ksriram@nist.gov>
- Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
  - From: "Ricardo V. Oliveira" <rveloso@cs.ucla.edu>
- Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
  - From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
- Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
  - From: "Ricardo V. Oliveira" <rveloso@CS.UCLA.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
Next by Date: [RRG] Precision of the goals?
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Comments on the Design Goals I-D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread