[RRG] re: A new draft about Hierarchical Routing Architecture

[Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>]

Hi,

Now I can provide a link to the HRA document.
http://www.huawei.com/file/download.do?f=3073

Any comment is welcomed.

Best regards, 
Xu Xiaohu

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzmeyer@nic.fr]
> 发送时间: 2007年11月23日 18:01
> 收件人: Xu Xiaohu
> 抄送: 'Routing Research Group'
> 主题: Re: A new draft about Hierarchical Routing Architecture
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:57:47PM +0100,
>  Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com> wrote
>  a message of 51 lines which said:
> 
> > These days I have received some feedbacks and questions publicly or
> > privately.
> 
> Apparently, your draft was not submitted? I do not find it in the
> official repository, only in your initial message. I suggest to submit it.
> 
> > Take mobile phone as an example, you don't feel inconvenient at the
> > age of no mobile phone, but once you use it, you will find you can
> > not leave it almost. I believe the cryptographic host identifier has
> > some kind of character like mobile phone.
> 
> The relationship between the deployment of mobile phones and
> cryptographic identifiers is a complete mystery to me...
> 
> > Any comment is welcomed.
> 
> The security section certainly requires more time and effort. I've
> seen many ID/loc proposals and there is a common structure: the author
> has a new idea (often a variation of existing ideas), post the draft
> without security analysis, find that their proposal is much better
> than any other proposal, and, when they try to add security in their
> proposal, they discover that their proposal becomes as complicated and
> difficult as the others.
> 
> Security is often the Achille's heel of ID/loc separation. Every
> indirection is a new failure point.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg