Re: [RRG] Is 12 bytes really so scary?

[Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>]

On Dec 8, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Robin Whittle wrote:
> ......
> eFIT-APT has even slower aspirations for distributing the data
> globally, but has some smart (I think) arrangements for local
> full-database Query Servers (Default Mappers) which are also ITRDs -
> so most of the traffic is handled by caching ITRCs.  Now (according
> to what I heard in the meeting), APT is to be merged with, or
> adapted to, LISP.

Hi Robin,

I almost caught up with RRG mail by IETF week, but how falling behind  
again. But someone sent the above quote to me, so a quick  
clarification seems necessary:
- Please call APT just as APT
  (eFIT is a project name, not a design as LISP is).
- What you heard at the end of RRG meeting was a plan to write
  a LISP-APT internet-draft to show the APT mapping scheme
  interworking with LISP.

I appreciate your effort of comparing different approaches. I'm also  
doing the same and will write up my version soon.

Lixia

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg