Re: [RRG] Process proposal: agenda admission control

["Hui Deng" <denghui02@gmail.com>]

I support this suggestion.
Neutral background would be necessary for one eligible for this committee.

-Hui

2007/12/13, Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As we all agree, RRG meeting time is our most limited resource, and
> perhaps also the most effective means to facilitate our convergence
> process. Thus, we would like to allocate adequate amount of time for
> discussions in our future meetings.  Consequently, we need to be more
> selective on the presentations of new proposals.  We would like to
> reiterate that the floor remains open for new proposals, so new
> proposals may still be submitted as a draft and considered on the
> mailing list.  However, we would like to ensure that only high
> quality proposals with substantive novelty will take group-wide time.
>
> To assist us in this, the chairs plan to form a "program committee".
> These would be interested members who are respected architectural
> contributors.  For a proposal to be considered for an agenda slot,
> the backers of the proposal should approach members of this committee
> and ask them to review their proposal.  Committee members that have a
> conflict of interest (e.g., same employer) should recuse themselves.
> If any member of the committee feels that the presentation is
> worthwhile, it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting.  The
> identity of the endorsing member will be made public.
>
> We would deeply appreciate your comments on this proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Lixia & Tony
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg