On 2007-12-22 08:22, Dino Farinacci wrote:
On 2007-12-21 19:46, Dino Farinacci wrote:Sites *can* have multiple EID-prefixes in LISP, and they will occur when small EID-prefix blocks are allocated because a site under-estimated the number of systems it has to number.LISP is in some sense a step backwards since it assumes that sites won't be running multiple prefixes, so the only use of multiple addresses will be link local v. ULA v. PI.Right, but that doesn't necessarily imply that all hosts in the site (or to be more precise, all interfaces) have multiple simultaneousBut that's because the netadmin didn't configure it that way. If they did decide to a LISP-enabled site can support it.So not sure what your point is.
Only to point out the obvious, I guess...
Brian
addresses. The basic IPv6 model does assume that if a site has multiple prefixes, some or all interfaces will have multiple addresses (and multiple AAAA records for the same FQDN).Fine, but LISP makes no assumption about this. That is what I take issue with in your statement.Dino
-- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg