[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip

To: 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>, 'Robin Whittle' <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Subject: re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:28:05 +0100
Cc: 'Routing Research Group' <rrg@psg.com>, 'Tony Li' <tli@cisco.com>, 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Dino Farinacci' <dino@cisco.com>, 'David Meyer' <dmm@1-4-5.net>
In-reply-to: <479848E7.2010001@cisco.com>

Hi Eliot,
> And indeed I am engineering a solution that does not require host
> granularity.  I believe mechanisms such as HIP and MIPv6 need to be
> improved to scale to address that problem.
HIP uses host granularity because the HIT/HI is a flat label without any
structure, but the HoA in MIPv6 has structure so it's easy to scale to
address that problem, e.g. NEMO or CRIO like mechanisms.
Best wishes,
Xiaohu XU 


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
Next by Date: Re: Granularity (was Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip)
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] ALT + NERD is inelegant & inefficient, compared to APT or Ivip
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread