[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems

To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:18:04 -0400
Cc: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>, Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>, Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDEF2@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <47D16205.1080406@firstpr.com.au> <7EC200C2-CCE0-4E12-8E1F-76CD52BA6240@cisco.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1029EDEF2@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)

Why is this a RRG subject anyway? If LISP (or anything else in RRG) hasan MTU problem, then all encapsulations do, and you want a general approach.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>

References:
- [RRG] LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
  - From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
- RE: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
Previous by thread: RE: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
Next by thread: RE: [RRG] Re: LISP PMTU & fragmentation problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread