Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

Lars Eggert wrote:
> I must admit that I don't follow the RRG very closely very often (it 
> requires a full-time commitment), but I don't remember the discussion 
> around this document resulting in a consensus. But I may be wrong, and 
> RGs don't need to operate by consensus. In any event, the document is 
> definitely is a good start.

And I would argue it's a bad idea to aim for consensus, having attempted 
to do so before.  That's a huge hurdle for getting work done.  The IETF 
has it for standardization.  I don't see the need for research output.

Eliot

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg