Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap

[David R Oran <oran@cisco.com>]

On May 22, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Tony Li wrote:

> |Except for traceability, fault isolation, etc., not to mention
> |latency
> |of state-reestablishment after a crash in the absence of an explicit
> |control plane state establishment protocol, etc.
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Wouldn't those issues be reasonably address if the mapping was  
> stable enough
> to be cached in stable storage?
yes, assuming people don't do really stupid things like create zombie  
state, or worse flood it back into the routing system after a box has  
been down for a long time.

> Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg