On May 22, 2008, at 21:48, Tony Li wrote:
Except for traceability, fault isolation, etc., not to mention latency of state-reestablishment after a crash in the absence of an explicit control plane state establishment protocol, etc.Wouldn't those issues be reasonably address if the mapping was stable enough to be cached in stable storage?
Or if the mapping was stateless, i.e., 1-to-1? Traceability, fault isolation, etc., would also be mitigated by 1-to-1 mapping. Especially in IPv6, where the mapping could be as simple as a prefix exchange. - Christian -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg