RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|However, this isn't very relevant to RRG goals. What is relevant,
|IMHO, is divining whether the BGP4 system for IPv4 will hit a
|catastrophic scaling limit within a foreseeable timescale. If the
|answer is 'yes' we need a first-class solution for IPv4; if the
|answer is 'no' we only need a first-class solution for IPv6. Since
|my divination skills are weak, it seems safer to seek a first-class
|solution for both.


s/BGP4 system/current routing architecture/

To date, no one has demonstrated a routing architecture that scales without
aggregation, and aggregation is THE sore point.

Can we please not pick on BGP?  It simply confuses the issue.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg