[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6

To: <tony.li@tony.li>, "Randall Atkinson" <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:25:40 -0400
Cc: "Routing Research Group" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <754A8DE4E3F64660BD83CEFCBE007FE1@ad.redback.com>
References: <483934A7.90800@firstpr.com.au> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC072E@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <48397AB9.1020501@firstpr.com.au>,<483A1A83.4080208@gmail.com> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC073F@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <754A8DE4E3F64660BD83CEFCBE007FE1@ad.redback.com>

> If you believe this, then the issue is real and is strategic, not 
> tactical. We have the opportunity to Do It Right, and we should.
>
> Tony

I believe that we have the opportunity to "Do It Right", and we should.


Now, what is "right"? and how to get there?  These are not as obvious
(at least not to me and not yet). 

Thanks, Ross



--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>

References:
- [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus? Users will not adopt solutions which result in "split-system" functionality
Previous by thread: RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
Next by thread: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread