[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6
- To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Subject: [RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:52:59 +1200
- Cc: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YTcivQEiQJ34UjXhjetSZX6YqT7dxrtrgPXNn7UAGzuYgZ//gUkKZXcxHog2ivy13d03JhPKQ1/S4UlpaNGnNci6s5M4NGg/WlUglw4wP45RSbFh0h1PDm4ZsBvfyaiyh7oygYvZ2cIjrp+5SMXZymc8GXUJ1kgcTo2zhn0vjIg=
- In-reply-to: <483CB6D6.50607@firstpr.com.au>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <483CB6D6.50607@firstpr.com.au>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
Who said we were making such a bet?
On 2008-05-28 13:35, Robin Whittle wrote:
> Short version:
>
> We should agree that the RRG solution needs to work for both
> IPv4 and IPv6.
Who is disagreeing with that statement?
But we shouldn't, IMHO, waste RRG time on analysing IPv6 deployment
issues. That discussion is ongoing, elsewhere.
Brian
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg