RE: [RRG] Moving forward...

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|> Our recommendation should be applicable to IPv6.  It may or may not
|> also apply to IPv4, but at the very least must provide a path forward
|> for IPv6.
|
|Would this allow for separate solutions for IPv4 and IPv6?  RRG
|shouldn't force itself to handle IPv4 with the same protocol that
|handles IPv6 IMO.


Separate solutions would seem to fall under the "may not also apply" case.


|But since your text talks about a "recommendation" and not a protocol,
|this may actually not be an issue.


Please recall that our charter is only to make a recommendation.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg