re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious

[Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>]

> |However, I can't rule out that there may be some fancier, better and
> |more ambitious approaches to solving the IPv6 routing scaling
> |problem.  This includes fundamentally different approaches,
> |especially if we contemplate changing the IPv6 protocols.
> 
> 
> ... And that's exactly what we are chartered to explore.
 
Hi Tony,

I agree with your proposed statement. BTW, should we add "solving the
address depletion issue" into the RRG design goals document as a desired
goal and not mention IPv6 specifically and directly?

Best regards,
Xiaohu XU



--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg