RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

Hi Xiaohu,

|I agree with your proposed statement. BTW, should we add "solving the
|address depletion issue" into the RRG design goals document as 
|a desired
|goal and not mention IPv6 specifically and directly?


Could you concisely state your understanding of the issue?  To my
understanding, the only address depletion issue is the usage of the v4
address space, and somehow, I think you're thinking of something else.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg