[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng
Hi Per,
You wrote:
> Efforts to extend the life of v4 may fall on one simple issue.
> What if we can't re-claim or reuse enough of the previously
> assigned address-blocks to meet the markets demand for growth at
> the customer edge?
I agree.
I can't say for sure what will happen. I believe there are good
reasons to believe that commercial pressures will drive the adoption
of a finer slicing and better management technique - map-encap - to
make it technically possible without worsening the routing scaling
problem.
One that happens, I figure money and IP addresses will change hands
quite merrily.
> We may know how much of the space isn't announced to the DFZ or
> otherwise have potential for reuse, but there's no data to
> support that this actually will happen, even if all and any
> constraints on routing were lifted.
"Data" about the future is hard to come by!
I have no data on how much address space existing holders would give
up, but if the price was right, I am sure that quite a lot of space
could be found. The idea is to find it in largish chunks, so that
chunk can be a single advertised prefix split up among many -
hundreds or maybe thousands - of end-user networks.
I am not sure of the morality or legality of those with space now
selling it. I am just saying that if there are folks clamouring for
it with money to pay for it, then this is a good motivation for
those with sparsely used space to consolidate their usage into a
smaller patch and to vacate the rest. Maybe the vacant space goes
back to the RIR, or maybe they sell it or rent it.
I just think that at every point in time for a long while to come,
it will be easier and more profitable to use IPv4 more intensively
than try to get paying home and SOHO customers (or end-user
networks) to do without IPv4 addresses and rely on IPv6 only -
albeit with some IPv4 space for ALGs, NAT-PT, NAT64 etc.
I wrote more on this:
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2008-June/011005.html
and have discussed this notion on the RRG in previous months. I am
not sure I convinced anyone, but it looks pretty likely to me.
- Robin
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg