[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
- To: 'Noel Chiappa' <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, rrg@psg.com, tony.li@tony.li
- Subject: RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
- From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 08:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=WIosluo0q4Tzbu28S1hf1pLLk74m8I/3qiErmNK5/xVLIDjaRbVlqFMF3iL6c+xPipydfRInrR1IUjYXlUGFhL8m7/TYtk6p7vPq/OCaAsxJA8wa75DXY5t3Egv+NPbVmmyjpr7qWzsplSQMoJafTjEo2LOP4w4sG0rH9wDVfBM=;
- In-reply-to: <370BE1D2E4CA43B292359AF6F6D51336@ad.redback.com>
- Reply-to: pesherb@yahoo.com
> As has been remarked before, routing and addressing are
> fundamentally inseparable...
It seems right but what is the basis for that statement? Does anyone has a mathematical formula that proves it?
Thanks,
Peter
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:
> From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
> Subject: RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
> To: "'Noel Chiappa'" <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, rrg@psg.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 9:33 PM
> [Catching up...]
>
> | > I think the RRG has only focused on loc/id split
> and
> |really hasn't gone
> | > into greater depth with other routing
> architectures.
> |
> |Ah, I don't consider the location/identity split a
> 'routing
> |architecture'.
> |It's an ancillary aspect of the overall system
> architecture,
> |one which has at
> |best some influence on particular desired operational
> goals
> |having to do with
> |routing (e.g. provider independence).
> |
> |To me, routing architectures are about things like
> 'what
> |entity choses the
> |path the packets flow along', and 'how are those
> paths
> |computed', 'what data
> |does that computation need', 'how is that data
> distributed', etc.
> |network-sized-mapping-database.
>
>
> As has been remarked before, routing and addressing are
> fundamentally
> inseparable, and indeed our charter is to explore both
> routing and
> addressing architectures. To my mind, a locator/identifier
> split is a major
> change in the addressing architecture that will
> fundamentally change the
> scalability of the routing subsystem.
>
> If folks have other tricks up their sleeve that result in
> improved routing
> scalability, that's certainly most welcome.
>
> Tony
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with
> the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message
> text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> &
> ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg