Yes, once could imagine a world in which connectivity is mandated and maintained such that street-like routing will work. But unless we want to change the regulatory and business structures of base IP connectivity, we do not live in that world. (If we are willing to make that degree of change, something like compact routing becomes far more interesting, as that requires explicit and predictable resource sharing.)
Yours, Joel Scott Brim wrote:
On 7/3/08 3:45 PM, William Herrin allegedly wrote:-MY- point was that Line 1 need not be there at all. It is an identifier which serves no role in the routing. If you get line 1 wrong or leave it off entirely your letter will still get to me.It's a port selector. -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
-- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg