[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing



In einer eMail vom 11.07.2008 06:19:20 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt bill@herrin.us:
Based on: http://bill.herrin.us/network/geoag.gif

The path I claim your algorithm picks for packets from D to E is
wrong. It subjects an unaffiliated third-party to an unbounded and
unrecoverable expense. The only valid path from D to E is D-C-G-F-E.
If your algorithm might pick some other path, your algorithm is
broken. Period.

This is your "put up or shut up" moment. If you think your algorithm
picks D-C-G-F-E to get from D to E -AND- picks H-G-C-B-A to get from H
to A (the only valid paths for those two communications), show us how
nodes C and G over in "right area" make those polar-opposite path
selections based on the aggregated knowledge that destinations A and E
both reside in "left area."
Sorry Bill, but your proof is broken.You may consider your black lines as one or eventually two directed arrows (2 if opposite) and compute a path being a sequence of arrows all bound to the same endpoint.
 
Heiner