In einer eMail vom 10.07.2008 22:21:51 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, <HeinerHummel@aol.com> wrote: Thank you. But this is not what I have in mind. Because it would be
too much to acquire the topological view of the net of all ISPs'
OSPF-networks, this view must be reduced, such that each current router is
surrounded by strict links in the near neighborhood and by loose and looser
links the more remote they are. Geographical information will hereby be helpful,
but the nodes and links of the resultingly viewed topology could be
bestowed with whichever attributes wrt QoS/SLA.
Brian, correct me if I am wrong: DiffServ'axiom: I (the current router) do
not see the network outside. I try to do my contribution for differentiated
forwarding service based on my router-local experiences.Right?
Whereas, with topology aggregation, the router can see the entire
ISPs-network and base on it the own contributions. It will see many paths to the
destination. It will precisely see that network part which would forward
packets via it. There is much more and much better TE possible. The router could
do better things than wasting the time with unnecessary UPDATE churn.
Heiner
|