[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality

To: "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "'Routing Research Group'" <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:43:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <487FF920.70606@gmail.com>
References: <487FF3D0.8080903@firstpr.com.au> <487FF920.70606@gmail.com>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 

|In any case, it isn't forbidden, and never has been. There's
|absolutely nothing to stop the ISPs in Klingonville grouping
|together to set up a local IXP, which gets a short prefix from
|the RIR, and then uses it as a metro area prefix for all
|local customers, with whatever policies and configurations
|are needed in the IXP-connected routers.


http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-ispac-00

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
Previous by thread: re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread