Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable

["William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com> wrote:
> Some other proposal does not need an
> id-locator mapping infrastructure. However, it requires every host to have a
> FQDN name. In nature, the FQDN name plays the role of the identifier in the
> resolution infrastructure, on behave of the IDENTIFIER of the session. This
> way, two name entities together play the role of the identifier, with each
> one of them suitable for different context.

If you you change the IP address so it has -only- locator semantics,
what makes you think a DNS A record -isn't- an id, and the DNS -isn't-
an id-locator mapping infrastructure?

Regards,
Bill

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg