RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt

[jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>

     >> Once the 128 bit address is split into locator and identifier 

    > This is especially true since locators are only locally unique.

Err, did you mean 'the locator part of a split IPv6 address only identifies a
local scope, not necessarily an individual interface'? (A locally-unique
locator would only be usable within the scope in which it is unique - which is
not that useful, so your original wording doesn't make sense to me.)

	Noel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg