One of the topics that came up in Dublin during Lixia's talk was theacceptability of renumbering. How do folks feel about an architecturalsolution requiring renumbering to retain scalability?
It will surely make new technology easier to deploy and scale better. Will the bearer of the cost accept it? Well, it there is compelling benefit, I think so. Do I think there is compelling benefits, again, I think so.
And we think (the LISP crew) that single-homed sites that want to become multi-homed sites will be willing to renumber. Will multi-homed sites renumber for a loc/id split solution, I think it depends on how simple it is to run the solution and hence provide the benefits we have talked about before.
Now, the hard question is, will multi-homed sites who already have renumbered with PI space, will they renumber again so if a PTR solution is put in place, we can advertise less routes rather than more for interworking purposes.
Dino -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg