[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
On Aug 20, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Large corporations that have large networks are ISPs.
Please define 'large'.
Perhaps your question is a rhetorical device, and you're merely
trying to
point out that how to define 'large company' is a tarpit.
Yep. However, a more general point as any attempt to create an
architecture that depends on some subjective term like 'large' is
doomed to fail. Since there is benefit from having connectivity/
provider independent addresses, there will always be pressure to
liberalize the allocation policy, resulting in the exact same mess
we're in now (if you'll remember, the original IPv6 allocation plan
was to limit the total number of "top-level aggregators" to 8192).
And, of course, whether an organization is 'large' is irrelevant when
it comes to whether or not the addresses for that organization are
multi-homed.
Regards,
-drc
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg