[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
- To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:56:56 +1200
- Cc: rrg@psg.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rkSAZ9jwGhciuVXZGd+UDPjsA7E5PKfcnl67r5ru2LqGmxvV5vjOA1wcUFhXjX8tvl pYLRQLajJDjyfXKHg5ZqvucqdAetbBBLYr/Ro2Cd8uFV3ZVds3D0IGw8z+ia4k1lqY3+ 2tHCWXf8UEOuRrOydJMmFJMj+2bTh5E9eeMkI=
- In-reply-to: <20080820153220.0B6486BE64B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <20080820153220.0B6486BE64B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
On 2008-08-21 03:32, Noel Chiappa wrote:
...
>
> Put it another way, if you decide the DFZ can handle E entries, and the
> total size of the network is N nodes, if a company has more than N/E nodes,
> it gets PI locators, and if it has less than N/E, it doesn't.
Of course, this has the same chance of being accepted as registry
policy as I do of running faster than Usain Bolt. But it points us
once again to the fact that user sites do not pay the correct
price for their externality costs. As we've known for many years,
an appropriate economic model would be for ISPs to be charged per
BGP route that they advertise, and to pass these costs on to user
sites proportionately.
By the way, I showed a graphical history of E against sqrt(N) in
the IEPG meeting in Dublin (slide 8 in
http://www.iepg.org/2008-07-iepg72/carpenter.pdf ). I'm working
on a writeup.
Brian
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg