Re: [RRG] Renumbering...

[David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>]

Sorry, I'm not following.

On Aug 21, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Tony Li wrote:
> EIDs are still the input to the mapping function

Right.

> and to have the mapping aggregate, then there can be a need
> to renumber EIDs.

So, purely for sake of argument, let's say:

EID = domain name
Locator = IP address
Mapping function = DNS_lookup(EID) -> Locator

(Please don't go down the rathole of DNS not being a good mapping  
function, I'm just using it for illustrative purposes)

What are you saying needs to aggregate and why do you believe  
renumbering of EIDs would be necessary?

Thanks,
-drc


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg