Tony Li wrote:
One of the topics that came up in Dublin during Lixia's talk was the acceptability of renumbering. How do folks feel about an architectural solution requiring renumbering to retain scalability?
We _already_ have a scalable solution that requires end-sites to renumber: RFC 4192. The target market rolled their eyes and got the RIRs to change policy to allow PI assignments in IPv6, just like in IPv4, rather than even give it a try because the very concept was so unacceptable.
Can we please quit beating this horse? S -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg