[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...

31 Day BGP Profile: 30-July-2008 00:00 - 29-August-2008 23:59 (UTC+1000)

Number of BGP Update Messages:  4387614
Number of Prefix Updates:  5642288
Number of Prefix Withdrawals:  503877
Average Prefixes per BGP Update:  1.40
Average BGP Update Messages per second:  1.59
Average Prefix Updates per second:  2.22
Peak BGP Update Message Rate per second:  6308  (14:02:43 Fri, 22-Aug-2008)
Peak Prefix Update Rate per second:  3207  (18:36:01 Tue, 5-Aug-2008)
Peak Prefix Withdraw Rate per second:  15121  (14:03:18 Fri, 22-Aug-2008


How would these figures look like in case of a renumbering action ?!

 

Heiner





-------- Kabel E-Mail Reply ---------------
From: stephen@sprunk.org
To : tony.li@tony.li
Date: 30.08.2008 02:10:54

Tony Li wrote:
> One of the topics that came up in Dublin during Lixia's talk was the
> acceptability of renumbering. How do folks feel about an architectural
> solution requiring renumbering to retain scalability?
>

We _already_ have a scalable solution that requires end-sites to
renumber: RFC 4192. The target market rolled their eyes and got the
RIRs to change policy to allow PI assignments in IPv6, just like in
IPv4, rather than even give it a try because the very concept was so
unacceptable.

Can we please quit beating this horse?

S

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg