Dino correctly points out that sites can avoid renumbering and advertiseaggregates in the locator space. This would represent some amount ofsavings. However, this would seem to affect the quality of routing as whensuch aggregates are injected back into legacy routing, it would create stretch/TE issues. We've seen that folks deaggregate to address these issues today. Could we address this somehow?
I said that?You have to be clear which namespace I was talking about. When you say "advertise aggregates" you need to say "advertise EID-prefix aggregates". Is that what you intended to para-phrase?
Dino -- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg