Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination

[Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>]

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Jen wrote:

> As I said in an earlier post, I still feel GSE requires a mapping system
> like other separation schemes.  The mapping is just in the DNS record.
> If an edge site stopped using the RG provider specified in the DNS
> record, it must update its authoritative servers to map itself to a new
> RG that IS one of its current providers.  This is a mapping change.

My operating system requires a mapping between virtual and physical addresses.

So what?

The statement in your paper that I pointed out is still false.  The
mapping change for GSE you point out above is the exact same mapping
change needed for an elimination scheme (modulo any splitting of RG and
ESD+STP in the DNS).

The definition you are using for separation in your paper is either
inconsistent, or not very useful.


Regards,

// Steve


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg