Re: State machine / failure detection / rehoming support

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2005-01-18, at 18.00, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> (much good sense deleted)
>
>> At the same time, I have real trouble separating the finite state
> > machine of the protocol (as opposed to the states seen by the shim6
> > user) from the definition of the protocol.
>
> Yes, I certainly don't mean it's easy to do. And maybe what needs
> to be separate is that external view of the states, rather than
> the fully specified FSM, which I agree is tightly bound to the
> protocol.

 From what I am reading most people seem to agree with the above (or 
variations of it) and that we try and split that into a separate 
document. I will try and get that into the charter then. If I have 
misunderstood the views, please let me know...

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQe5IhaarNKXTPFCVEQILTQCcCTAj+wdue3pGeAcP4lcs2MP1PrAAoIqc
H7WkZ9PyKTm7yPv8eFleLKud
=pug9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----