RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Marcelo,

> well, i am not sure about this...
> My point was about establishing new communication after an outage with 
> external hosts that don't implement the shim.
> This is important becuase at least in the early days, most of nodes 
> won't implement shim.
> Explicitly taking this point into consideration would allow to provide 
> some degree of fault tolerance (i.e. the capability of establishing new 
> communications after an outage) even in communications with nodes that 
> don't implement the shim.

This is a general transition issue; I guess the protocol should specify how
an shim6 endpoint works with a non-shim6 endpoint.

John