RE: fragmenting the discussion space

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Mobility is orthogonal to the solution for multihoming.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-shim6@psg.com [mailto:owner-shim6@psg.com] On 
> Behalf Of avri@psg.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:18 AM
> To: shim6
> Subject: Re: fragmenting the discussion space
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I can understand that excluding some of the related issues makes a 
> discussion easier.  But isn't one of the reasons we have fragmented 
> solutions and lack a coherent architecture due to the fact 
> that we have 
> not yet learned to discuss complex issues including all of 
> the related 
> threads?
> 
> In many cases, ignoring the details to get a quick solution out is 
> reasonable.  In the case of changing the basic behavior of IP and of 
> the addressing architecture, this seems to me to be unwise.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On 15 mar 2005, at 08.58, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > This thread shows fairly clearly why the BOF co-chairs
> > excluded mobility: we wanted shim6 to focus on a concrete
> > solution space, not to re-open old debates that we finally
> > got past in multi6.
> >
> 
> 
>