[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: how mobile do we want to be

To: "Ryuji Wakikawa" <ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
Subject: RE: how mobile do we want to be
From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:03:52 -0500
Cc: "Thierry Ernst" <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, <shim6@psg.com>

Hello,

> Since SHIM6 and MIP6/NEMO are very similar design concept (to me),
> it indicates that MIP6/NEMO are also capability to support 
> site/end-multihoming by itself. 

Would you tell us why you believe SHIM6 and MIP6/NEMO in technical
architecture terms?  Thanks.

P.S. Chairs I believe there is consensus we are to focus on multihoming
and not mobility.  If I am correct my input is for you to shut down this
discussion and many mails that are doing nothing to further the delivery
of a multihoming solution.  But I will continue as above to discuss
interesting points raised that are clear technically and worth my tiime.
thanks

/jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: how mobile do we want to be
  - From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: shim - transport/app communication
Next by Date: Re: how mobile do we want to be
Previous by thread: RE: how mobile do we want to be
Next by thread: Re: how mobile do we want to be
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread