Re: proposed text for charter

[Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>]

About the following item in the charter:
o  The solution must not cause problems for mobility. That is, it
    should be possible to continue using Mobile IPv6 even when using
    shim6 simultaneously. However, any optimizations or advanced
    configurations are out of scope for shim6.

I would suggest to write "should be possile to continue using mobility
support protocols such as Mobile IPv6 land NEMO Basic Support"

An additional item such as the following one would be useful:

- The WG will ensure that various mechanisms defined within other IETF
WGs will continue to work when using shmi6 simultaneously.  To achieve
this, the Shim6 WG will interact with other WGs when needed, and may
place requirements on the protocols developed by those WGs.


Thierry.