RE: proposed text for charter

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

I agree ....
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-shim6@psg.com [mailto:owner-shim6@psg.com] On 
> Behalf Of Thierry Ernst
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 11:01 PM
> To: shim6
> Subject: Re: proposed text for charter
> 
> 
> 
> About the following item in the charter:
> o  The solution must not cause problems for mobility. That is, it
>     should be possible to continue using Mobile IPv6 even when using
>     shim6 simultaneously. However, any optimizations or advanced
>     configurations are out of scope for shim6.
> 
> I would suggest to write "should be possile to continue using mobility
> support protocols such as Mobile IPv6 land NEMO Basic Support"
> 
> An additional item such as the following one would be useful:
> 
> - The WG will ensure that various mechanisms defined within other IETF
> WGs will continue to work when using shmi6 simultaneously.  To achieve
> this, the Shim6 WG will interact with other WGs when needed, and may
> place requirements on the protocols developed by those WGs.
> 
> 
> Thierry.
> 
>