Re: addition of TLV to locator ID or locator ID set

[Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jari Arkko wrote:

> has most often failed. See http://www.arkko.com/publications/SWP03.pdf
> for a discussion of some of these cases.

Interesting. <comments sent off list>

> No. There were, in fact, a number of other fundamental issues that 
> led to the selection of CGA-in-ND-options approach in SEND over 
> AH-enhanced-with-CGA. These issues had to do with the division of 
> work within a stack, the expressive power of policy entries, 
> co-existence with non-SEND devices, mismatch between provided and 
> expected models (e.g. number of parties), and so on.

Apologies, I'm not questioning CGA and it's use with SeND at all.

I'm questioning wider off-link, non-ND use of CGA, eg with Shim.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
QOTD:
	The only easy way to tell a hamster from a gerbil is that the
	gerbil has more dark meat.